The United States, Turkey and Saudi Arabia have the highest share of large organisations with employee logins in stealer logs: 98.6%, 97.9% and 97.5% of the institutions we measure there. By depth of exposure the order changes: the median US organisation has 609 stolen employee credentials in circulation, the median Indian one 208 and the median Brazilian one 170, while Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania sit at the bottom on both measures. This ranking covers 36 countries and 1,856 organisations from the October 2026 snapshot of the Ransomnews Infostealer Exposure Dataset, and every country below has a page of its own.
Which countries have the most organisations exposed to infostealers?
Thirty of the 36 countries have a hit rate above 80%, which is the headline: in almost every economy we measure, more than four in five large institutions have at least one employee whose work password was captured from an infected device. The spread is at the edges. Twelve countries are above 93% (the United States, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Brazil, France, Portugal, India, Israel, Switzerland and Poland), and only five are below 80%: Sweden (79.6%), Ukraine (78.6%), Lithuania (72.9%), Latvia (72.4%) and Estonia (67.7%), with Ireland exactly at 80.0%. The three Baltic states are least exposed on every measure, with medians of 2, 6 and 6.5, which fits small workforces, a local-language web that the big stealer families target less, and a decade of eID and app-based login in the public sector that leaves fewer passwords to steal.
| # | Country | Orgs | Exposed | Median | New, 30 days | Gained new | Top sector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | 138 | 98.6% | 608.5 | 4,241 | 77.5% | Technology |
| 2 | Turkey | 47 | 97.9% | 71 | 549 | 74.5% | Universities |
| 3 | Saudi Arabia | 40 | 97.5% | 50.5 | 673 | 65.0% | Universities |
| 4 | South Africa | 60 | 96.7% | 63 | 847 | 63.3% | Universities |
| 5 | Spain | 46 | 95.7% | 73.5 | 1,220 | 67.4% | Universities |
| 6 | Brazil | 61 | 95.1% | 170 | 965 | 77.0% | Universities |
| 7 | France | 55 | 94.5% | 63 | 899 | 72.7% | Universities |
| 8 | Portugal | 35 | 94.3% | 35 | 265 | 40.0% | Universities |
| 9 | India | 69 | 94.2% | 208 | 3,626 | 78.3% | Technology |
| 10 | Israel | 48 | 93.8% | 20 | 207 | 45.8% | Banking and finance |
| 11 | Switzerland | 46 | 93.5% | 23 | 229 | 50.0% | Universities |
| 12 | Poland | 44 | 93.2% | 28.5 | 198 | 40.9% | Universities |
| 13 | Mexico | 55 | 92.7% | 65 | 1,661 | 60.0% | Universities |
| 14 | Germany | 55 | 92.7% | 40 | 666 | 67.3% | Universities |
| 15 | Canada | 71 | 91.5% | 62 | 1,333 | 70.4% | Universities |
| 16 | Italy | 46 | 91.3% | 43 | 1,622 | 65.2% | Universities |
| 17 | Australia | 68 | 91.2% | 23 | 1,043 | 50.0% | Universities |
| 18 | Austria | 43 | 90.7% | 16 | 68 | 25.6% | Universities |
| 19 | Belgium | 42 | 90.5% | 27 | 251 | 50.0% | Universities |
| 20 | United Kingdom | 73 | 90.4% | 55 | 938 | 63.0% | Universities |
| 21 | South Korea | 52 | 88.5% | 26.5 | 351 | 48.1% | Universities |
| 22 | Nigeria | 49 | 87.8% | 36 | 508 | 57.1% | Universities |
| 23 | Netherlands | 46 | 87.0% | 42.5 | 641 | 63.0% | Universities |
| 24 | Finland | 45 | 86.7% | 18 | 217 | 42.2% | Universities |
| 25 | Norway | 40 | 85.0% | 18.5 | 81 | 32.5% | Universities |
| 26 | United Arab Emirates | 46 | 84.8% | 28 | 281 | 47.8% | Universities |
| 27 | Denmark | 46 | 84.8% | 14.5 | 266 | 43.5% | Universities |
| 28 | Singapore | 46 | 82.6% | 15.5 | 184 | 26.1% | Universities |
| 29 | Japan | 67 | 82.1% | 14 | 180 | 34.3% | Media |
| 30 | Czechia | 38 | 81.6% | 14.5 | 54 | 36.8% | Universities |
| 31 | Ireland | 40 | 80.0% | 13.5 | 74 | 32.5% | Universities |
| 32 | Sweden | 49 | 79.6% | 23 | 397 | 53.1% | Retail |
| 33 | Ukraine | 42 | 78.6% | 10.5 | 10 | 11.9% | Universities |
| 34 | Lithuania | 48 | 72.9% | 6.5 | 52 | 25.0% | Universities |
| 35 | Latvia | 29 | 72.4% | 6 | 17 | 17.2% | Universities |
| 36 | Estonia | 31 | 67.7% | 2 | 12 | 16.1% | Banking and finance |
Why do the United States, India and Brazil lead by volume?
Headcount first. The US panel is drawn from the largest employers on earth, so the same infection rate per employee produces a far larger count of exposed credentials: the median US company carries 623 against 26 for the median company in the other 35 countries, more than twenty times as many. India and Brazil combine very large workforces with the second effect, which is supply. The stealer families that dominate the index, LummaC2, RedLine, Vidar and StealC, are distributed through cracked software, game cheats and malvertising, and the Telegram markets that trade their output have always harvested more from the Americas and South Asia than from Northern Europe. The index reflects where the infected machines are.
The sector mix adds a third layer. The most exposed sector in the United States and India is technology (medians of 1,062 and 1,594 respectively), where large IT-services and outsourcing workforces save work logins on personal hardware; in Brazil, Spain, Italy and most of the panel it is universities, where students share the institutional email domain. The 30-day figures confirm that these three are not carrying old stock: 78.3% of Indian, 77.5% of US and 77.0% of Brazilian organisations gained at least one new employee credential in the month to 13 October, the three highest rates in the panel.
Where is exposure growing fastest right now?
India, Italy, the United States and Mexico. The lifetime totals say where logs have piled up over years; the 30-day column says where the infections are happening now, and the two rankings differ. Measured as new employee credentials per organisation in the month to 13 October, India leads at 53 per organisation, followed by Italy (35), the United States (31), Mexico (30) and Spain (27); Italy and Mexico barely feature in the lifetime ranking, which is the point. In absolute terms the United States added 4,241 employee credentials in the month and India 3,626, between them a third of the panel’s entire monthly flow, and the share of organisations gaining at least one was highest in India (78.3%), the United States (77.5%), Brazil (77.0%), Turkey (74.5%) and France (72.7%).
At the quiet end the month added ten employee credentials across the whole Ukrainian panel, twelve in Estonia and 17 in Latvia, and fewer than one in five organisations there gained one. Japan is the large-economy outlier in the other direction: 82.1% of Japanese organisations are exposed but the median is 14 and only 34.3% gained a credential in the month, consistent with managed corporate devices and a workforce that rarely mixes personal and work logins in one browser profile. These are the countries to watch for the opposite reason: a sudden rise in their 30-day column would be a campaign, not noise.
Which sector is most exposed in each country?
Universities are the most exposed sector in 30 of the 36 countries, with a 100% hit rate in all but Lithuania, because students use the institutional domain on personal laptops. The exceptions are instructive: technology companies lead in the United States and India, banks lead in Israel and Estonia, media organisations in Japan and retailers in Sweden. At the other end, government and law-enforcement bodies are the least exposed sector in 24 countries, a pattern explored in our report on government bodies in stealer logs, and the universities page carries the full country breakdown for higher education.
Free tool
How does your own site score?
Run the same forty passive checks against your own domain: TLS and certificates, security headers, SPF and DMARC, cookies before consent, and what your stack quietly reveals. A grade out of 100 in about fifteen seconds.
No signup. Nothing installed. We only request what your site already serves publicly.
What do the stolen logins open, country by country?
The third-party service most often captured alongside a work email login is Salesforce in the United States (8,343 logins across 47 organisations), India (2,579), France, the Netherlands and Switzerland; Autodesk, which is student software, in Brazil, Spain, Italy, Mexico (4,705 logins), Portugal, Poland, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Belgium, Denmark, Czechia, Ireland, Nigeria and Sweden; Zoom in Israel, South Korea, Turkey, Singapore, Canada and Norway; and Okta, the identity provider whose login opens everything behind single sign-on, in Australia (1,934 logins across 11 organisations), the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, Finland, Japan and Estonia. Germany is the only country where an ERP system leads, with 304 SAP S/4HANA Cloud logins across six organisations. Our companion piece on what stolen SaaS logins open works through the whole stack.
What is on each country page?
Each of the 36 country pages carries the same material, recomputed from the stored snapshot every month: the hit rate, median and 30-day figures for that country against the panel as a whole; the country’s rank by share exposed and by credentials per organisation; a sector table for the national panel; the companies measured, by employee credentials, with the caveat that these are logins captured from infected devices rather than evidence that the company’s own systems were breached; the third-party services most often captured alongside work logins in that country; and a short FAQ. Government, university and hospital figures appear only in aggregate. The United States, United Kingdom and Germany pages are the fullest, because those panels are largest.
What this means
A country hit rate above 90% is a statement about personal devices, not national cyber-defence. The records behind these figures are produced when an employee saves a work password in a browser on a machine that later runs a cracked installer, and no national agency can manage that machine. The useful comparison is month on month: from the November snapshot every country page will show whether its hit rate, median and 30-day exposure moved, and the countries whose employee exposure rises are the ones we expect to see rising in the confirmed ransomware attack statistics a quarter later, because stolen logins are what initial access brokers sell.
Frequently asked questions
Which country is most exposed to infostealer malware?
By share of large organisations with at least one employee credential in stealer logs, the United States (98.6%), Turkey (97.9%) and Saudi Arabia (97.5%). By credentials per organisation, the United States (median 609), India (208) and Brazil (170). The figures come from the October 2026 snapshot of the Ransomnews Infostealer Exposure Dataset.
Which country is least exposed to infostealers?
Estonia, where 67.7% of the 31 large organisations measured have employee credentials in stealer logs and the median organisation has two. Latvia (72.4%) and Lithuania (72.9%) follow, and Ukraine has the lowest rate of new exposure, with 11.9% of organisations gaining a credential in the month.
Does a high national hit rate mean the country has weak cyber security?
No. The records are produced on infected personal and unmanaged devices on which staff saved work passwords, so the rate measures where stealer malware is distributed and how large workforces are, more than the quality of any national defence. The median and the 30-day figures are better comparisons than the hit rate alone.
How many organisations are measured per country?
Between 29 (Latvia) and 138 (the United States), chosen from each country’s largest listed companies, main banks, telecoms and utilities, central government and law-enforcement bodies, leading universities, major hospitals and national media. The panel is fixed so that month-on-month change reflects the threat and not the sample.
Can I see the data for my own country or company?
Every country has a page linked from the table above, and any domain can be checked free with Stealercheck, which queries the same index and returns lifetime, 30-day and 7-day counts without showing any credential.
Sources and further reading
- Infostealer statistics: the dataset page, with the live tables, the methodology and the public API
- Universities and government: the two sectors that bracket every national ranking
- Stealercheck: check any domain against the same index
- Top infostealer families in 2026: the malware behind the records
- Confirmed ransomware attacks by sector, country and year: the other end of the credential pipeline
- IRS Criminal Investigation: U.S. joins international action against RedLine and META infostealers, Operation Magnus, 29 October 2024
- BleepingComputer: Lumma infostealer malware operation disrupted, 2,300 domains seized, 21 May 2025
The Ransomnews Monthly
One email a month. Original leak-site data, victim census updates, and the findings that did not make the articles. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
Double opt-in. We store your email, signup time, and IP for consent records (GDPR Art. 7). See our privacy policy.
